New research explains why eating something caloric with an unpleasant taste is often preferable to more palatable food with no calories (photo: Wikimedia)
New research explains why eating something caloric with an unpleasant taste is often preferable to more palatable food with no calories.
New research explains why eating something caloric with an unpleasant taste is often preferable to more palatable food with no calories.
New research explains why eating something caloric with an unpleasant taste is often preferable to more palatable food with no calories (photo: Wikimedia)
By Elton Alisson | Agência FAPESP – Different brain circuits are invoked by the pleasure we derive from eating sweet foods and the calories they supply.
Given the choice between eating something caloric with an unpleasant taste and more palatable food with no calories, some vertebrates may choose the former, prioritizing energy to assure their survival.
This finding comes from a study performed by researchers at Yale University in the United States, in collaboration with colleagues at the University of São Paulo’s Biomedical Science Institute (ICB-USP) and the Federal University of the ABC’s Center for Mathematics, Computation & Cognition (CMCC-UFABC) in Brazil.
The study has recently been published in the online edition of Nature Neuroscience and featured in The Telegraph, a British newspaper.
Tatiana Lima Ferreira, a researcher at CMCC-UFABC, was on the team responsible for the study. Ferreira was awarded a scholarship abroad by FAPESP to conduct postdoctoral research at the Yale laboratory headed by Ivan Eid Tavares de Araújo, a Brazilian-born scientist and principal investigator for the study.
“We observed that different neural circuits in the same brain region were involved in the perception of the sensation of pleasure produced by eating sweet food and encoding the calories it supplies,” Ferreira told Agência FAPESP.
Through a series of experiments with mice, the researchers found that the pleasure derived from eating, as well as the caloric value and nutrition of food, invokes neural circuits in the striatum, a subcortical part of the forebrain and a major portion of the basal ganglia.
However, different neural circuits in the same brain region are involved in these two processes. Circuits in the ventral striatum are responsible for the perception of pleasure or reward (hedonia) derived from food with a sweet taste, whereas circuits in the dorsal striatum recognize the caloric and nutritional value of sweet food.
“In previous studies, the Yale research group I collaborate with had already reported that circuits in the striatum and the dopaminergic neurons that enervate this brain region could be involved in recognizing nutritional value and taste,” Ferreira said. Striatal dopaminergic neurons express dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure and reward.
“But until now it wasn’t known whether the circuits in the dorsal and ventral parts of the striatum were equally involved in recognizing these two characteristics,” she added.
Different circuits
To determine which neural circuits in the striatum are involved in the perception of these specific attributes of food, the researchers performed an experiment designed to quantify the expression of dopamine in the striata of mice after exposure to sweet substances with and without calories.
The mice licked the spout of a sipper-bottle containing sweetener and received stomach injections of solutions containing sugar (D-glucose) or an equal amount of non-caloric sweetener (sucralose).
The results of the experiment showed that the amount of dopamine released by the ventral striatum increased indiscriminately in response to the intake of both sugar and sweetener.
“The neural circuits in the ventral striatum don’t distinguish between caloric and non-caloric ingestion. Dopamine is expressed by this brain region in response to mere palatability,” Ferreira said.
In the case of the dorsal striatum, however, the amount of dopamine released by this brain region increased only when sweetener intake was accompanied by intragastric sugar infusion. According to Ferreira, this suggests that the neural circuits involved are selectively sensitive to caloric value.
“Although sweetener is palatable and much sweeter than sugar, dopamine release in the dorsal striatum didn’t increase when the animals were exposed to it,” she said. “The reason may be that sweetener is non-caloric, unlike sugar.”
The researchers also evaluated the effect of an unpalatable but caloric substance on the expression of dopamine in these brain regions of mice. To this end, they altered the taste of the sweetener in the sipper by adding a small amount of denatonium benzoate, a bitter compound commonly used as an aversive agent. At the same time, the mice received intragastric infusions of sugar (glucose).
This alteration in the taste of the sweetener inhibited dopamine release in the ventral striatum induced by the intragastric sugar infusion, but the amount of dopamine expressed in the dorsal striatum increased.
“The experiment showed that sugar recruits neurons in the striatal dopaminergic pathway. These circuits typically prioritize caloric ingestion over taste, which in this case was unpleasant,” Ferreira said.
“The conclusion may be that if you have a ‘sweet tooth’, this is due to your brain’s craving for calories rather than an addiction to sweetness as such.”
The article “Separate circuitries encode the hedonic and nutritional values of sugar” (doi: 10.1038/nn.4224) by Araújo et al. can be read by subscribers to the journal Nature Neuroscience at www.nature.com/neuro/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nn.4224.html.
The Agency FAPESP licenses news via Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) so that they can be republished free of charge and in a simple way by other digital or printed vehicles. Agência FAPESP must be credited as the source of the content being republished and the name of the reporter (if any) must be attributed. Using the HMTL button below allows compliance with these rules, detailed in Digital Republishing Policy FAPESP.