Brazilian researchers applied an examination protocol based on an analysis of 12 lung regions to 180 severe patients and found that the higher the lung ultrasound score the greater the risk of ICU admission, intubation and death (photo: Rovena Rosa/Agência Brasil)

Lung ultrasound helps predict COVID-19 patient outcomes
2021-02-03
PT ES

Brazilian researchers applied an examination protocol based on an analysis of 12 lung regions to 180 severe patients and found that the higher the lung ultrasound score the greater the risk of ICU admission, intubation and death.

Lung ultrasound helps predict COVID-19 patient outcomes

Brazilian researchers applied an examination protocol based on an analysis of 12 lung regions to 180 severe patients and found that the higher the lung ultrasound score the greater the risk of ICU admission, intubation and death.

2021-02-03
PT ES

Brazilian researchers applied an examination protocol based on an analysis of 12 lung regions to 180 severe patients and found that the higher the lung ultrasound score the greater the risk of ICU admission, intubation and death (photo: Rovena Rosa/Agência Brasil)

 

By Elton Alisson  |  Agência FAPESP – Lung ultrasound, considered a simple method for diagnosing lung disease, can also help predict the clinical progression of severe COVID-19 patients, according to a study conducted at the University of São Paulo’s Medical School (FM-USP) in São Paulo City, Brazil.

The principal investigator for the study was Heraldo Possolo de Souza, a professor at FM-USP and an attending physician at its teaching and general hospital, Hospital das Clínicas (HC). 

The researchers applied an ultrasound examination protocol covering 12 lung regions in 180 COVID-19 patients undergoing treatment at HC. The results showed that the higher the lung ultrasound score, the greater the risk of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), intubation, and death.

The study was supported by FAPESP and reported in an article published in Annals of Intensive Care.

“We found lung ultrasound to be a good predictor of the need for intensive care with endotracheal intubation and the risk of death for COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency room. It can be a simple, cheap way to estimate the prognosis for patients infected by the virus,” Souza told Agência FAPESP.

At the start of the pandemic, Souza and other emergency room (ER) attendings at HC and other hospitals worldwide had to process overwhelming numbers of patients with insufficient resources. In learning to tackle this challenge, which has now returned owing to the rebound in patient numbers, healthcare teams have found they must use tools to assess the severity of each case so that resources such as ICU beds and ventilators are correctly allocated and care priorities can be established.

Given the importance of diagnostic imaging of the lungs to the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients, the FM-USP group assumed it could also be useful to screen patients admitted with the infection based on predicted outcome. They chose lung ultrasound to test the hypothesis because the method is widely used in ERs, as well as being fast, easy to perform with portable equipment, and inexpensive. 

“Point-of-care lung ultrasound is extremely important in the pandemic. It can be performed at the bedside by ER staff who don’t need to be as highly trained to interpret the images as they do in the case of a chest CT scan, for example,” said Julio Cesar Garcia de Alencar, an ER attending at HC and first author of the article on the study.

Methodology

The study subjects were patients diagnosed by RT-PCR and admitted to HC between March and May 2020, in the initial stages of the pandemic. The researchers performed lung ultrasound exams on the volunteers and calculated their scores on the day of admission to the ER. The median age of the subjects was 60, and well over half (58%) were male.

The scoring methodology, known as the LUS protocol, entailed examining 12 lung regions in the anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects of the chest wall on both sides. Each region was evaluated by aeration pattern, with scores ranging from zero to 3 points according to the worst pattern observed. The final score was the sum of points in all 12 regions, ranging from zero to 36.

The results showed that patients scoring 14-16 were most likely to require ICU care, and a fatal outcome was most likely for those with scores above 20.

The average LUS was 18.7, with a standard deviation of 6.8. Of the 180 patients enrolled, 109 (60%) were discharged alive, 74 (56%) were treated in the ICU, 52 (39%) were intubated and 61 (33%) died.

“We confirmed the hypothesis that LUS helps predict ICU admission, intubation, and death in severe COVID-19 patients,” Alencar said.

Higher risk of death

In another study conducted as part of the project and published in the journal PLOS ONE, the same group of researchers found that out of 506 patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the ER, 333 (65.9%) were discharged home, 153 (30.2%) died, and 20 (3.9%) remained in the hospital. A total of 300 patients (59.3%) required intensive care, and 227 (44.9%) had to be intubated. Mortality was 30.2% overall, and 55.9% for intubated patients.

“We created a group of ER physicians at HC not just to provide patient care but to work as researchers who collect data that can be used as markers to predict the outcomes of severe cases of COVID-19,” Souza said.

The Annals of Intensive Care article “Lung ultrasound score predicts outcomes in COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department” (doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00799-w) by Julio Cesar Garcia de Alencar, Julio Flavio Meirelles Marchini, Lucas Oliveira Marino, Sabrina Correa da Costa Ribeiro, Cauê Gasparotto Bueno, Victor Paro da Cunha, Felippe Lazar Neto, Rodrigo Antonio Brandão Neto and Heraldo Possolo Souza can be read at: annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13613-020-00799-w.pdf

The PLOS ONE article “Mortality and other outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease pneumonia admitted to the emergency department: a prospective observational Brazilian study” (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244532) by Rodrigo A. Brandão Neto, Julio F. Marchini, Lucas O. Marino, Julio C. G. Alencar, Felippe Lazar Neto, Sabrina Ribeiro, Fernando V. Salvetti, Hassan Rahhal, Luz Marina Gomez Gomez, Caue G. Bueno, Carine C. Faria, Victor P. da Cunha, Eduardo Padrão, Irineu T. Velasco and Heraldo Possolo de Souza can be read at: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244532.

 

  Republish
 

Republish

The Agency FAPESP licenses news via Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) so that they can be republished free of charge and in a simple way by other digital or printed vehicles. Agência FAPESP must be credited as the source of the content being republished and the name of the reporter (if any) must be attributed. Using the HMTL button below allows compliance with these rules, detailed in Digital Republishing Policy FAPESP.